Review Hp Laptop Folio 1020 G1 Intel Core M 5y71
HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Ultrabook Review
Little jack of all trades. The manufacturer describes its new EliteBook as a sturdy travel companion. The build and emissions impress usa, just compromises take to exist made in performance compared with the competition.
For the original German review, see here.
Who isn't looking for the ideal companion in the business sector? HP presents a 12.5-inch business device for 2250 Euros (~$2428) with its EliteBook 1020 G1 and even tops the previously tested HP EliteBook 820 G1. The biggest difference is the QHD screen with touch support, which places our present review sample in the ultrabook category. A new Broadwell processor inside provides the needed computing power. The highlight: The frugal CPU is cooled without a fan. HP still uses an 8 GB working retentivity that operates in dual-channel style and a 256 GB SSD.
We checked whether this price is justified and whether the little EliteBook tin stand up upwards against business contenders based on some comparison models. We used our powerful configuration of Lenovo'southward ThinkPad X250 with a cost of 1950 Euros (~$2104). Information technology sports an economical Intel Core i7 5600U, 8 GB of working memory (unmarried-aqueduct) and a 360 GB SSD not-volatile storage. We also added Dell's Latitude E7250 to the group of comparison devices. Our Dell review sample has a marginally lower computing performance due to an Intel Cadre i7-5300U. Dell installs 8 GB of working memory and an SSD storage with a total capacity of 256 GB. In guild to not lose touch with the 800 lineup, we volition occasionally refer to our previous review of the HP EliteBook 820 G1.
Memory
8192 MB
, dual-channel 1600 MHz LPDDR3
Display
12.50 inch xvi:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, Sharp SHP142F, IPS, glossy: yeah
Mainboard
Intel Broadwell-Y PCH-LP (Premium)
Storage
Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP, 256 GB
, 196 GB free
Weight
1.245 kg ( = 43.92 oz / 2.74 pounds), Power Supply: 317 g ( = 11.18 oz / 0.7 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or retentivity sticks with similar specifications.
HP exemplary fulfills the loftier demands that we place on a 2250-Euro (~$2428) laptop for the almost office. The choice of materials is mainly limited to aluminum parts and is largely used on the underside. A reason for that could exist the temperature management strategy since our review sample does not accept a fan. Like as seen in virtually premium concern categories, the EliteBook fulfills the MIL-ST 810G1 military standard. The laptop has to withstand a customized test series of shocks, drops, and vibrations. The manufacturer delivers an impeccably built device; all corners are rounded accurately. The laptop can easily be opened with 1 finger. The resulting resistance is pleasantly low although the hinge has a firm hold on the display. The brandish even stops rocking quickly after shakes. Overall, we are happy with the EliteBook's feel because of the sleek curves and contours nosotros find on the brandish'due south back. HP'due south laptop is not only a perfect companion due to its size of 12.5-inches, but also its elevation of one.57 cm in conjunction with a weight of 1245 grams make it piece of cake to stow in nearly numberless and suitcases. There are no carve up maintenance covers on the underside, and the battery cannot be removed.
❌
A business organization partner for mobile utilise full resolution
HP'south interface positioning strategy appealed to u.s.a.. All important connections are in the rear area on the correct and left sides. Information technology is also superb that HP has left enough room between the neighboring HDMI and expansion ports for connecting fifty-fifty larger peripherals. Although the interface diverseness is meager, HP includes an adapter for VGA-out and Ethernet port free of charge on top.
Communication
The included Ethernet adapter has to be used for cabled network connections. Intel's dual-band Wireless-Air-conditioning 7265 module makes wireless advice possible. The existent-life data transmission rates are ascertained in the author'due south personal test setup. An iMac Retina (2014) with a Broadcom 802.eleven ac module is used for comparison the results. The devices are placed roughly fifty cm apart, and the Speedport-W 724V router is ane story beneath both devices. That equals a straight distance of approximately 3 - 4 meters. HP'south review sample settled to 14 MB/s and the iMac to 36 MB/s after a series of 5 GB test files. We have to note that the review sample started the test with over 30 MB/south, but it dropped to approx. 14 MB/s after a few seconds. The EliteBook accomplished a information rate of 54 - sixty MB/s when moving the exam to the same story. A laptop-to-laptop connectedness via Gigabit Ethernet cord resulted in a transmission speed of 115 MB/due south both means.
Security
A certain standard of security features belongs to the necessary bones configuration particularly in the business sector, and the EliteBook can offer that. In addition to a Trusted Platform Module (TPM), a fingerprint reader is installed in our review sample. Furthermore, the manufacturer lists a complete volume encryption and pre-boot authentication in its production description. A Kensington lock provides physical security. The corresponding cable lock, a SmartCard reader and a protective screen filter are offered on HP's accessories folio.
More details well-nigh the unmarried security features tin be institute in our dedicated commodity.
Accessories
The review sample is shipped with some brochures and an adapter that adds a VGA-out and Ethernet port.
Device-specific and universal accessories for our review sample can exist plant on the manufacturer'southward website. They include wireless display extensions (135 Euros, ~$145), USB adapters for HDMI and DVI ports (75 - 100 Euros, ~$80 - ~$107), service packages, storage expansions, anti-theft solutions, etc. The docking stations, ranging from 160 to 280 Euros (~$172 to ~$302), are especially interesting. They can add ii USB 3.0 ports, iv USB ii.0 ports, an HDMI-out, a display port, a Gigabit Ethernet port, and headphone-out and microphone-in. The dock also has several ability plugs for HP laptops.
Maintenance
There are no maintenance covers on the EliteBook's underside, and thus the entire base unit has to be removed. The used Torx screws make that even more difficult for the terminate user. Should the savvy user have a corresponding screwdriver at hand, it is easy to accept off the base of operations plate subsequently removing 11 screws. Nothing stands in the way of potential maintenance afterward their removal. Details can be found in the instruction guide.
Warranty
The buyer will likely be pleased nearly a 3-year warranty in view of a price of 2250 Euros (~$2428). A number of additional packages tin also be purchased on the manufacturer'south folio. They range from a bones warranty upgrade for 240 Euros (~$259, including on-site back up from a technician/call center/remote assistance) up to the known "any happens" insurance (4 years: 650 Euros, ~$701, including on-site service during journeys, accidental damage, retentiveness of defect media).
Keyboard
Although HP'due south EliteBook is small with 12.5-inches, the user volition not have to waive a comfy keyboard. Fast typing without delays is possible owing to firm keys and a soft drib with a crisp feedback. A 2-level keyboard backlight is as well installed making it possible to work accurately in darker rooms. Touch-typists will soon be familiar with the keyboard.
Touchpad
Mouse navigation is performed on an approx. nine.4 x 5.6 cm touchpad. The otherwise solid input device only shows response weaknesses at the edges and in the corners. Scrolling and other gestures are detected without major problems. Our review sample was shipped with a very sleek glass surface that could have had a flake more grip. HP's and so-chosen ForcePad'due south biggest highlight is its pressure sensitive surface. A light tap is enough to trigger a control - there is no physical click (or that is to say only with very potent pressure level). Overall, the finger input device is suitable for even working longer with the laptop.
Touchscreen
Our inputs were always identified rapidly and without problems. We did not define whatsoever restrictions even close to the screen's edges. The capacitive screen functions impeccably and its employ is convincing.
QHD are the magic letters in terms of screen. HP relies on a high-quality IPS display with a resolution of 2560x1440 pixels. As mentioned in a higher place, the glare screen tin also be used as an input device for the 12.five-inch ultrabook. The contenders do not feature quite such a high resolution and all uncompromisingly employ Total HD. However, the contenders have some advantages. Lenovo's ThinkPad has a matte surface, and Dell's Latitude convinces with Gorilla Glass and an anti-fingerprint blanket. Nosotros ascertained an average brightness of 297.2 cd/chiliad² in our EliteBook. Although HP'south laptop is not at all a nighttime candidate with this effulgence, it is in last place in our comparison circular. Lenovo'southward ultrabook impresses with an average of 358 cd/yard². Nosotros did non detect a PWM flickering even in lower brightness settings.
| HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Hd Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 HD Graphics 5500, 5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series SSDSC2BF360A5L | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 HD Graphics 5500, 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | HP EliteBook 820 G1 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -33% | -33% | -40% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.three | 44.14 -34% | 44.48 -34% | 39.89 -41% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.2 | 65.8 -32% | 66.2 -31% | 59 -39% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.9 | 45.71 -34% | 45.96 -33% | 40.98 -41% |
| Screen | -viii% | -27% | -98% | |
| Effulgence middle | 306 | 397 30% | 360 eighteen% | 229 -25% |
| Brightness | 297 | 357 20% | 330 11% | 211 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 81 1% | 81 1% | 86 viii% |
| Blackness Level * | 0.3141 | 0.44 -40% | 0.53 -69% | 0.63 -101% |
| Contrast | 974 | 902 -seven% | 679 -thirty% | 363 -63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.01 | four.two -40% | five.58 -85% | 10.75 -257% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.13 | 3.1 one% | 3.98 -27% | xi.72 -274% |
| Gamma | two.33 94% | two.6 85% | ii.21 100% | two.62 84% |
| CCT | 6484 100% | 6246 104% | 6192 105% | 15283 43% |
| Color Infinite (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 42 -32% | 42.2 -32% | 37 -xl% |
| Color Space (Per centum of sRGB) | 65.5 | |||
| Full Average (Plan / Settings) | -21% / -15% | -30% / -28% | -69% / -82% |
* ... smaller is better
| 302 cd/m² | 331 cd/m² | 302 cd/1000² | ||
| 291 cd/1000² | 306 cd/grand² | 300 cd/m² | ||
| 266 cd/g² | 280 cd/m² | 297 cd/m² | ||
Distribution of brightness
Sharp SHP142F
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 331 cd/g² (Nits) Average: 297.2 cd/grand²
Brightness Distribution: lxxx %
Centre on Battery: 307 cd/m²
Contrast: 974:1 (Blackness: 0.3141 cd/1000²)
ΔE Color 3.01 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale three.13 | 0.64-98 Ø5.half-dozen
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.half-dozen.three 3D)
68.nine% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
96.2% sRGB (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
67.iii% Brandish P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
We ascertained a contrast of 974:i in our review sample. The screen also largely stands out with rich blackness hues subjectively. A color temperature of 7203 K is achieved in the screen's middle. An ideal rate would be effectually 6500 Chiliad. A look at the color-space coverage reveals that HP'southward EliteBook 1020 is non made for professional graphic pattern. The AdobeRGB space is covered by 62% and the sRGB space by 82.6%. These rates are quite decent and on par with a current Apple MacBook Retina xiii. The color and grayscale level analysis disclose a DeltaE shift of 3. That clearly dropped even further after calibration. Overall, the screen in the EliteBook is superior to most contenders. A particularly abrasive drawback is, all the same, the slightly blurred prototype, which is presumably due to the touchscreen layer.
The installed glare-type screen prevents using the laptop in direct calorie-free. However, its brightness of virtually 300 cd/m² is enough for working with the device in the shade or under clouds outdoors without major restrictions.
Thanks to the underlying IPS engineering science, it is possible to use the laptop in virtually every thinkable position. Only the tight opening angles of approximately 125° could be wider for longer apply on the lap during train or car trips. We would mention Dell's Breadth E7250 as an example, which can exist opened up to 180°.
The quick-responding components in the present 12.five-inch ultrabook from HP are to prove its suitability for the role and multimedia sectors. The 256 GB SSD storage and 8 GB working memory that operates in dual-channel mode speak for that. A special focus is placed on the QHD screen that is also an input selection. A new and economic Broadwell CPU clocks within to provide the system with the required computing power. These prerequisites turn the 12.v-inch EliteBook into an always prepared workhorse.
Arrangement information: HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1
A pregnant innovation is the CPU installed in our review sample. HP has opted for Intel's Core M 5Y51 from the new Broadwell architecture. A base clock of 1.1 GHz and a Turbo fashion speed of 2600 MHz have to compete against potent rivals. Nosotros find Intel'southward Core i7-5600U with a clock range of 2.6 - 3.2 GHz in Lenovo's ThinkPad. The wide clock range of the EliteBook should be especially suitable for the function and multimedia sectors. Some more demanding applications are all the same viable. Intel specifies a TDP of just 4.5 watts. The power dissipation of the contenders is 10.v watts higher - at least when we believe Intel's optimistic specifications. Nosotros would like to examine to what extent the unlike CPU models vary in the Cinebench benchmarks. For this purpose, we await at the multi-core examination of Cinebench version R15. The contenders accomplish two-times higher scores than our review sample right away. This does not change in the single-core test, either. The EliteBook's clock charge per unit ranged from ane.4 to 1.5 GHz during the tests.
An advantage of HP'due south ultrabook is that it does not matter whether it is used in Ac or battery modes. The same score is reached in both cases, according to Cinebench R15.
More details and benchmarks can be found in our respective FAQ section.
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4130 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
6686 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4187 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4018
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5291
Cinebench R10 Rendering Unmarried 32Bit
3190
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
xv.7 fps
Cinebench R11.v CPU Multi 64Bit
1.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Unmarried 64Bit
0.96 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
17.65 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
152 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Unmarried 64Bit
84 Points
Aid
Working with HP's new ultrabook is fun. All applications opened apace, and use was always shine. The device just occasionally stuttered when multiple applications, Internet activity and a HD video ran for a longer fourth dimension. The PCMark 7 and PCMark 8 benchmarks scores confirm this subjective impression. All contenders accept a higher performance owing to their stronger processors. A problem that evolved afterwards some fourth dimension was that the CPU operated nether its base clock, which is because HP's Folio 1020 does not feature an active fan system.
| HP EliteBook Page 1020 G1 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Hard disk drive Graphics 5500, 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 HD Graphics 5500, 5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series SSDSC2BF360A5L | HP EliteBook 820 G1 Hard disk drive Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark eight | 21% | 37% | 49% | |
| Habitation Score Accelerated v2 | 2191 | 2772 27% | 3148 44% | 3624 65% |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2644 | 3052 xv% | 3458 31% | 3045 15% |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3217 | 4345 35% | 5363 67% | |
| PCMark 7 | ||||
| Score | 4045 | 4662 15% | 4609 14% | 5196 28% |
| Full Boilerplate (Programme / Settings) | eighteen% / nineteen% | 26% / 31% | 39% / 44% |
| PCMark seven Score | 4045 points | |
| PCMark 8 Habitation Score Accelerated v2 | 2191 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2644 points | |
| PCMark viii Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3217 points | |
| Help | ||
HP wanted to build a noiseless ultrabook. Since the storage solution was to also follow this objective, a 256 GB SSD storage was chosen. It comes from Samsung'southward PM851 lineup. The manufacturer states a service life of 1.5 million hours without downtime for the Chiliad.ii storage device (MTBF).
We employ the CrystalDiskMark benchmark program for ascertaining factual write and read rates. The sequential read rates of HP's device particularly convince with speeds close to 520 MB/s. The EliteBook is on par with its contenders in the write rates and important 4k scores.
More details and benchmark results can be found here.
| HP EliteBook Page 1020 G1 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 Hd Graphics 5500, 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 Hard disk Graphics 5500, 5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Serial SSDSC2BF360A5L | HP EliteBook 820 G1 Hd Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark three.0 | -ten% | -33% | -5% | |
| Read Seq | 518 | 509 -2% | 419.8 -19% | 428.5 -17% |
| Write Seq | 239.5 | 244 2% | 228.vi -5% | 263.8 10% |
| Read 512 | 415.vi | 428 three% | 355.2 -15% | 352.5 -15% |
| Write 512 | 237.9 | 244 three% | 203.3 -15% | 261.seven 10% |
| Read 4k | 28.17 | 29 3% | 27.86 -1% | 28.44 1% |
| Write 4k | 91.two | 61 -33% | 15.3 -83% | 124 36% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 327.3 | 214 -35% | 163.nine -50% | 156.5 -52% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 234.viii | 180 -23% | 60.2 -74% | 198.two -16% |
Sequential Read: 518 MB/s
Sequential Write: 239.5 MB/south
4K QD32 Write: 234.eight MB/s
Sequential Write: 229.5MB/due south
Access Fourth dimension Read: 0.137ms
Access Time Write: 0.044ms
Like in the contenders, HP'south EliteBook Folio has to be content with a processor-integrated graphics carte. Intel'due south HD Graphics 5300 has a core clock of 900 MHz and a memory clock of 800 MHz. Its operation is located between an Intel HD Graphics 4400 and 4000. The iGPU's naming is slightly confusing at first because it is as well below an Intel Hard disk Graphics 5000. Dell's Latitude E7250 and Lenovo's ThinkPad X250 use an Intel Hd Graphics 5500 owing to their stronger processors. We tin observe the exact differences in 3DMark 11. The single graphics cards are extremely far apart. Dell's Latitude and HP'due south EliteBook 820 G1 achieve over fifty% more points than our review sample. Lenovo'due south ThinkPad reaps in an even ameliorate score with 77% more points.
HP's ultrabook operates without losses in bombardment mode, every bit already seen in the CPU benchmarks. It as well achieved 610 points here.
More comparisons and details can exist plant in our article about current laptop graphics cards.
Legend
HP EliteBook 820 G1 Intel Cadre i7-4600U, Intel HD Graphics 4400, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Serial SSDSC2BF180A4H
| 3DMark eleven Performance | 615 points | |
| 3DMark Water ice Storm Standard Score | 25301 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2814 points | |
| Help | ||
The combination of an extremely frugal CPU and processor-integrated graphics unit largely prevents enjoying games. Merely rarely will newer games exist rendered smoothly using low settings. Games similar Alien Isolation or Middle-globe: Shadow of Mordor cannot exist played lag-gratis even in minimum quality settings. A FIFA night will also flop due to a maximum of nineteen.xi fps. The EliteBook's target group might not be gamers, but particularly one-time classics will be rendered smoothly on the ultrabook.
System Noise
The review sample is absolutely noiseless thanks to the fan-less cooling strategy.
Noise Level
| Idle | / / dB(A) | |
| Load | / dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB forty dB(A) fifty dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
We have special involvement in analyzing the temperature development of the fan-less review sample. The surfaces of the plastic and aluminum casing exercise not estrus up much during idle mode. A hot spot of not fifty-fifty 31 °C on the underside is not at all lamentable. Although the temperature clearly climbs during load, disconcerting temperatures of over 40 °C are non reached. The keyboard reaches upwards to 36 °C in the right dorsum area but that does non restrict working with the EliteBook. Using the ultrabook on the lap is besides possible without problems. The power supply heats upwardly from thirty.4 °C in idle to 37.2 °C during load.
But to what extent does omitting a fan take its cost? To reply this question, nosotros expect at the CPU's temperature within. The ultrabook is faced with a stress scenario via the programs FurMark and Prime95. The processor'south clock speed drops from 2.half dozen GHz to approximately 500 MHz right from the showtime of our exam process. This does not change after an hr of load, either. The CPU'south height temperature of 55 °C is reached later on a while and does not increment further from that instant. We rerun the 3DMark 11 later on the examination process and observe that equal scores as in a cold first are achieved.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 37 °C = 99 F Average: 32.ane °C = 90 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 39.vi °C = 103 F Average: 33.iii °C = 92 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 37.2 °C = 99 F | Room Temperature 21.ii °C = 70 F | Fluke 62 Max
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 27.four °C = 81 F Average: 26.4 °C = 80 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 30.5 °C = 87 F Average: 28.vi °C = 83 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C = 87 F | Room Temperature 20.9 °C = seventy F | Fluke 62 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side nether maximal load is 32.i °C / xc F, compared to the boilerplate of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.4 to 58.4 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The lesser heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.four °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.half-dozen °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.iv °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of like devices was 28.iii °C / 82.9 F (-4.1 °C / -vii.4 F).
Nosotros cannot say that HP'southward EliteBook Page develops a broad audio spectrum. Too many trebles disrupt music playback. Even the volume is rather middling. However, Skype calls delight with a articulate voice quality. Music lovers will definitely utilize external devices. The speakers are barely strong enough to defy louder surroundings.
Power Consumption
Our review sample was not peculiarly guzzling in idle. The power consumption ranged from 3.4 watts to seven.4 watts here. Lenovo'south Ultrabook has a minimum of 2.7 watts but can demand as much as 9 watts in this case. Dell's laptop consumes even more with up to ix.4 watts. A reason might exist the screens' higher brightness. Our findings in "Temperature" are reflected in the load power consumption: The ultrabook requires 18.4 watts at the showtime, which so decreases to 14.3 watts. A look at the rivals shows considerably higher ability consumption. Both Dell's and Lenovo's laptops clearly surpass xl watts. The power supply'southward maximum of 45 watts is most definitely sufficient for the HP review sample.
| HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Hard disk Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 HD Graphics 5500, 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 HD Graphics 5500, 5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Serial SSDSC2BF360A5L | HP EliteBook 820 G1 Hard disk Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -61% | -45% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | iii.iv | four.1 -21% | 2.7 21% | iii.2 6% |
| Idle Average * | 6.7 | 8.3 -24% | vii -four% | 5.2 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.v | nine.4 -25% | viii -7% | 7.5 -0% |
| Load Average * | 14.6 | 31.half dozen -116% | 28.6 -96% | 34.3 -135% |
| Load Maximum * | eighteen.4 | 40.iv -120% | 44.3 -141% | 26.8 -46% |
* ... smaller is amend
HP installs a iv-cell battery with a chapters of 36 Wh in its 12.five-inch ultrabook.
We will outset look at the maximum possible battery runtime. We prepare the screen's effulgence to minimum, disabled the advice modules, and selected the energy-saving mode for this. Bombardment Eater's Reader's test simulates reading texts. Our review sample close down after exactly eleven hours. Although the EliteBook sports more energy-efficient hardware than its contenders, the comparison devices all shut down considerably later on.
We simulate a real-life scenario via our Wi-Fi examination. Nosotros reproduce browsing on the Internet using a screen brightness of 150 cd/m². Unfortunately, HP'south ultrabook close down later approximately 7 hours and will thus non manage a whole workday. A direct comparing with all contenders is non possible due to varying test conditions. The ThinkPad shut downward two hours sooner, though. Just a reminder: Lenovo'southward ThinkPad is the strongest ultrabook in the test.
We initiated Bombardment Eater's Archetype test to ascertain the minimum possible battery runtime. The review sample went black after approximately 2.5 hours using Window's high-performance profile and maximum brightness. The selected rivals only reach an boilerplate of 1.five - ii hours.
| HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Hd Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Dell Breadth 12 E7250 Hard disk drive Graphics 5500, 5300U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 HD Graphics 5500, 5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Serial SSDSC2BF360A5L | HP EliteBook 820 G1 Hard disk Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 412 | 298 -28% | ||
| Battery Runtime | -five% | -13% | -one% | |
| Reader / Idle | 660 | 845 28% | 779 18% | 813 23% |
| Load | 164 | 103 -37% | 92 -44% | 124 -24% |
| Total Average (Programme / Settings) | -five% / -5% | -21% / -18% | -1% / -one% |
Bombardment Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 11h 00min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 6h 52min | |
| Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p | 5h 51min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 2h 44min |
Pros
+ Casing's build
+ Keyboard
+ High-quality QHD IPS screen
+ Temperature development
+ No noise evolution
+ Agreeably smooth workflow
Cons
- Performance compared with contenders
- Toll/performance
- Touchpad slightly inaccurate
- Speakers
HP'due south EliteBook Folio 1020 certainly asserted itself equally an office for on-the-motility. We barely plant whatever room for complaint - particularly in build. The aluminum casing convinces, and the screen that is behind a unmarried glass pane makes a loftier-quality impression. We find a minimum standard in connectivity. Withal, HP offers a small adapter free of accuse. Diverse maintenance options are made possible via the base of operations plate only secured with screws, which are easily removed with the correct screwdriver. Unfortunately, the battery can no longer only exist taken out. There is no demand to clean the fan because the EliteBook Folio 1020 features a fan-less design. We deem the input devices as an specially crucial buy benchmark for the business sector. The keyboard with its platonic drop is particularly compelling. However, high-quality materials and well-considered strategies were non just used for the casing, merely also for the screen: The manufacturer not merely treats us to a touchscreen, but also a QHD display. Nosotros ascertained a loftier standard in terms of brightness and contrast ratio. Furthermore, the glare IPS screen convinces with its viewing-angle stability. Unfortunately, HP does non offer a matte screen that would exist the better pick particularly in mobile apply. Since the slim 12.5-inch ultrabook does not have a fan, compromises have to be made in functioning. The selected Broadwell CPU cannot compete with the contenders. Still, system programs and working with the device are quite fast.
Overall, HP's EliteBook Folio 1020 is a small-scale well-conceived and high-quality companion. However, information technology is beyond question that the contenders mostly score better in terms of screen and performance. It is upwards to the buyer to make up one's mind whether a price of 2250 Euros (~$2428) is justified.
HP EliteBook Page 1020 G1 - 2015-04-thirteen 04/xiii/2015 v4(old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
From childhood on, the curiosity nigh the operation of the latest technical achievements continued. Out of this thirst for cognition followed studies in mathematics and computer science. Away from the earth of test reports, I work as a research assistant and project managing director in the field of Information technology security/cyber security for industry 4.0.
Nino Ricchizzi, 2015-04-17 (Update: 2018-05-15)
avitiawhissely1974.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-EliteBook-Folio-1020-G1-Ultrabook-Review.140653.0.html
0 Response to "Review Hp Laptop Folio 1020 G1 Intel Core M 5y71"
Post a Comment